During the documentary, Mark (one of Watsons subjects, aged 29) states that he agreed to do filming for Paul to show people why they should not drink alcohol. Vanda, one of his participants spoke of the abuse she endured from her Father, and when she told her Mother and she didnt believe her, thats when she turned to alcohol. These subjects were all willing participants, however their capacity to give consent comes into question. Frank SinatraCycles 1968 Frank Sinatra Enterprises, LLCReleased on: 1990-01-01Producer: Don C. Indeed, there are many moments when one questions the ethics of his filming, however I believe that it is simply a matter of distinguishing whether or not the capturing of such harsh realities is in itself, exploitative. At the same time, I do think Paul Watson exploited his subjects. However, Watsons humanity and compassion shines through. However, what I think strongly outweighs this are the positive effects of the film in terms of education. Thats exactly what I think about the film: it is extreme and crude in some scenes but this cannot be translated as exploitation but as accurate and careful explanation and evidence of a serious phenomenon such as alcoholism. As for Nigel, it can be said that he was exploited less than others, because his wife was constantly present, therefore she could control the actions of the filmmakers. 22/11/06 - 10:57 #8. Obliging by the rules of observational filmmaking, Watson, on the whole, assumes a fly-on-the-wall position and captures the destruction as it unfolds. francescamancini88. However in the documentary there is a shot of him asking Why am I asking you to watch Nigel die? and he then says that Nigels wife, Kath, had wanted it to be shown so that the audience would be made fully aware of the consequences of alcoholism. It is also true that sometimes the person who was interviewed didnt feel very comfortable about what he or she was saying and probably wasnt aware at all of what it was being said. Since 2016 we have been able to harvest 15 Bucks over the magical 200 inch mark, many eclipsing 215 inches and two bucks over 245 inches. RAIN IN MY HEART BOWY Rock 1,125Shazams play full song Get up to 5 months free of Apple Music Share OVERVIEW LYRICS PLAY FULL SONG Connect with Apple Music. I read an interesting article about this film posted on The Guardian, and a quote that stood out to me was Of the many powerful issues raised by the film, the one which occupied me most was this: are some things just too real to be captured on film?. That is a very emotional documentary that began in the hospital with 4 characters and ended in each of their homes- some of them were drunk, the rest are dead. This I feel undermines what his role as a filmmaker is as it shows his intentions for the direction of this documentary. Otherwise it would not have been so real and touching and would not have had such an effect on those who watch it. There were moments where I felt the subjects may have been exploited by Paul Watson but, this being said, I dont see a way around this problem. (2006). Paul Watson. Join Date; 14th June, 2011. The Facebook link I posted was created by Nigels son. This is just one example of the reaction that Watsons Rain in My Heart provoked; Not something that is watched and easily forgotten about. It quotes how Vanda told Paul Youre asking me while Im pickled in reference to his questions, as well as youre manipulating me. At one point it says: This type of documentary is not the best way to explain or explore alcoholisms origins. 0. To watch this sequence of Watson, truthfully revealing his professional flaw, for me, was quite humbling. Filmed over the course of a year, Paul Watson's camera follows them from Gillingham . Although this had a huge dramatic effect upon the viewer and it allowed the viewer to analyse the particular situation multiple times, I felt that Paul Watson was portraying them as if they were less in control of what they were saying, almost as if they were crazy. Just finished it and I wonder what happened to Mark and Vanda. Paul Watson has a lot to answer for (The Family probably started the reality trend) but Rain in my Heart made up for a lot. Its hard to give a black or white answer of whether or not Paul Watson exploit the subject. He explains himself, he is aware of what he is critised for, but overall has achieved an importantly informative film about alcohol and its effects. An example of this is when Paul W asked Vanda whether she was telling the truth about being abused as a child. There are certainly points in this film in which I believe that the subjects were exploited. It brought more power to the issues of alcohol and their lasting effects on the psyche. Maybe the subjects are letting Watson film them like this as a message to say this is a life you dont want to live and in saying that does Watsons exploiting of the subjects send a bigger message that in turn may help people going through the same things. Before i didnt know that alcoholism could lead to such a terrifying state and even death. It may be their escape from their issues, and what I think is also important to keep in mind is that if they are using alcohol for this reason, then it could have easily been any other drug. Play online or download to listen offline free - in HD audio, only on JioSaavn. This is also something Watson shouldnt go into. Play over 265 million tracks for free on SoundCloud. Moreover, one can say that the subjects were exploited not only in the aforementioned scenes, but generally throughout the film. There are many intimate moments within the documentary, such as the funeral of one of the subjects that had passed due to the abuse of alcohol. Covering Phoenix, Mesa, Glendale, Scottsdale, Gilbert, the valley . Thus exploiting their vulnerability to further push their weakness and end up with footage that will strike the audiences attention and maybe even get better ratings. Read about our approach to external linking. I also believe Watson tried his best to tackle these accusations, baring in mind that overdoing it throughout the documentary could appear to undermine the actual traumas of the patients and their families. Also, i think observation style makes audience to get more shock by the scene without explanation. Watson intrudes on his film, importantly (and rather unromantically, when we consider the idea of immersive movie magic) shows him forging all the social contracts with his subjects at the start. So yes, as we saw during the screening, he was primarily affected by alcohols effect on his father and then consequently, his entire family. Sometimes grief feels very isolating. The subjects and the families were happy to be filmed and it was unlikely that the film was going to bring more harm than good it was important that he looked at the whole picture and the awareness he could spread with such a film. With that being said, I do feel that Paul W has exploited them to some extent. This was maybe to excuse himself for what he maybe shouldnt have been doing and to tell the viewer that yes he thought it was wrong, but he was doing it for a reason to explore a topic that most people are scared of exploring. Rain in my Heart(TV Movie) Opinion Awards FAQ User Reviews User Ratings External Reviews Metacritic Reviews Details Full Cast and Crew Release Dates Official Sites Company Credits Filming & Production Technical Specs Storyline Taglines Plot Summary Synopsis Plot Keywords Parents Guide Did You Know? Twenty-nine when he appeared in. Sign-in or Try it free for 3 months. So all these people dont mind being shown in their most vulnerable state on national TV and even Watson at times ask the subjects if they would like him to turn the camera off. Makes a great gift for people who love cats or play the Secret Cat Forest game. I personally believe that the word exploit is quite a harsh word to put on the filmmaker without full justification, its made clear that the subjects wanted to be filmed, Watson treats this permission with a good amount of respect both for the subjects and the topic of the documentary whilst at the same time sustaining his role as the stand back and sympathetic-ear presence. It is not a pleastant sound. What I think is that Watson did not exploit his subjects in the film. Log in, Top Life Threatening Health Issues of Alcohol Abuse, Most Common Health Issues of Alcohol Abuse, Mental Instability Caused by Alcohol Abuse, Alcoholics Anonymous | May 11 | DonInLondon | Step 5 Share Your Truth, Fionulla F. AA Speaker Alcoholics Anonymous Speaker, . Once Watson sees this he is distinctively appalled and shocked that Vanda, after promising in a previous shot that she would fight to stay sober in the future, has gone back on her words and is drunk again. Maybe it could be argued that editing was used too much in this film as it told you how to feel at certain points. For Watson asks: What would you class as an alcoholic? Toni replies: Someone who cant go a day without a drink. Once this is said, Watson slowly zooms in on her face and responds: but you told me there are days where you cant go a day without a drink. Watsons response to Tonis statement could be stated as being overly dramatic for the audiences benefit, therefore, compiling with Ellis and most documentary critics argument that the director is always more concerned with how the potential audience will perceive the subject and story than the subject themselves. I believe it was not his job to cure the patients, neither was it to encourage them to drink, however his involvement with the hospital and its patients was simply to reveal the complex and brutal causes and effects of alcoholics. There is one point I dont like about Watsons technique. When he asked Toni to call and talk to his family, for example. When he asks of her troubled past, he is very interrogative as he continues to ask until she is brought to tears by the discussion of her brothers death, but rather than stop, he pushes on. The decision to include this part of Vandas drunk dialogue is one that is certainly questionable, especially since we are not given evidence as to whether or not she did consent to the inclusion once sober. The fact that it was all staged, distances the audience from the idea of a documentary as most believe that it must be as real as possible. Frank Sinatra Lyrics "Rain In My Heart" My eyes are dry, my love, since you've been gone, I haven't shed a tear, I'll never cry, my love, though every day seems like a hundred years, For I'm just a fool who clings to his pride but when I'm alone, I can hear the sound of rain in my heart, of the tears that I hide, Play online or download to listen offline free - in HD audio, only on JioSaavn. For one the subjects were extremely vulnerable which raises the question on whether they were in the right state of mind to consent to being filmed and telling their story. Also just to confirm Gillingham is a pretty shitty place to grow up in, so the documentary comes across as very sincere. The documentary follows four alcoholics in an observatory manner. Finally, the article posted below discusses Rain in my Heart alongside other documentaries of Paul Watson. We ask a lot of our hunters as many times we will pass 200 inch deer to pursue true giant deer. Ones initial reaction would be to strip her of the bottle however, Watson remains faithful to his observational aim and instead of forcefully stopping her he simply tells her that he is disappointed in her. The latest Arizona headlines, breaking news, in-depth investigations, politics, and local community stories that matter to you. The problem suddenly doesnt become the alcohol, but their mental state, which is something I learnt from the film. An example could be when Vanda talks about the monsters in her head, one of the monsters being her abusive father, that pushed her into the terrifying world of self-harm. I think theyre happy for the attention, to have someone to listen. However, as I mentioned previously, Watson neither encourages nor halts the emotional stress of the patients, he simply asks them questions about their mental state and at times even asks the patients if they would prefer the camera to be turned off. It follows 4 alcoholics from the hospital to their homes. He'd been self-harming repeatedly and been in and out of a psychiatric ward. So with saying that, I was satisfied with the way that Watson handled his participants. There is also the repetitive clip of when Vanda says her monsters are in her head. Its probably doing far more good than bad, just in terms of getting the reality of alcoholism out there. He pressed forward with the interview and filmming in the crual moment such as his subject vomitted and had a hard time with pain. If the subjects are happy to be filmed then I dont see the problem as long as they have a stable state of mind. Outside, the sparrows on the roof Are chirping in the dripping rain.Rain in my heart; rain on the roof; And memory sleeps beneath the gray And the windless sky and brings no dreams Of any well remembered day. Surely, this would mean that his documentary would attract more viewings but at least that would mean that more and more people would learn and be warned about the effects of alcoholism. Print this design in the 3.5 x 5" size. He is good at capturing facial expressions and touching moments, though he constantly replays repeated footage to create a moment. I was completely satisfied with his attempts to deal with accusations of taking advantage of their vulnerabilities throughout the film. Half a bottle of vodka on the train to work at the age of 17 began Mark's journey into alcoholism. But I dont think he exploited anyone in his documentary. That he doesnt so anything to stop them drinking is a part of their own agency, and I believe shows more respect than if he had intervened. When he interviews his subjects when they are drunk, the woman speaks of her monster inside, she used to suffer from sexual abusing by her father. This in essence in the subject saying that they are feeling exploited by the filmmaker and the documentary project. But in saying all this we must remember that all the people in the film agreed to be in the documentary. I found the piece riveting but extremely disturbing. I believe he does ask himself sincere ethical questions and that he answers them truthfully. There are multiple narratives that composes the documentary surrounding each alcoholic; delving into their health, issues and families through interviews and visual representations of their effects. However, it doesnt justify the ignore her drinking even he had a chance to stop her. This scene is perhaps one of the more uncomfortable in the film as Watson is merely documenting Vandas relapse back to alcohol and the range of mood swings she encounters. On the positive side of the argument I agree that Watson, through the cut away shots he includes throughout the film, allows himself to be more personal with the audience. Thus, having the camera in front of them made me feel that there was a sense of pressure on them to fulfil a certain image of an alcoholic. Watching Rain in my Heart was a particularly harrowing and educational experience for me as a viewer. After watching this documentary i get shock of the people shown. At no point during the documentary did I feel that the filmmaker was exploiting the subjects, the recording of what can be described as personal and intimate situations felt more like a significant necessity with moral intentions towards bringing awareness towards the seriousness of the consumption of alcohol. On the other hand, i personally feel like people are indeed exploited. I do feel that in a way Paul Watson has exploited all of his subjects in this film. Change), You are commenting using your Twitter account. And it is also a good example to discuss the ethical issues in the documentary. Watsons interference with the subject is, for the most part, kept to a minimum, although the interviews and conversations he has with the subjects comes across as interrogative at times. For before the revealing of the alcohol, Watson greets Vanda by pecking her on the mouth and cheek. He acts incredibly friendly with her by holding her shoulders when talking to her, slapping her cheek when she has fallen asleep from drinking etc. As with the film, this documentary presents some uncomfortable and hard to bear realities. All the footage that was quite hard to watch did, however, make the film much more real for me. Another was "drinking less" but needed a Zimmer frame with which to walk; she's 43. We follow Nigel and his supportive wife Claire as they spend their final weeks together. I thoroughly enjoyed this weeks viewing, I felt that it was very informative and educational to those who dont have much knowledge about alcoholism. All Watsons subjects agreed to being filmed whilst they were drunk before the filming commenced, and so the question is not should Watson have kept filming?, but rather should Watson have included that part of the footage?. This was mostly due to the fact that obviously he was filming people with huge vulnerability in their lives, therefore he was careful not to portray the situation as taking advantage of. Several times in the documentary we see him struggle to make decisions on how he will proceed with the footage he has. Other examples are when he continuing to film Nigels wife as she said goodbye to her dying husband in the hospital and when Vanda told a deep secret about the reason she became an alcoholic. But if some of us dont record it, no one else will learn about it. The question of the ethics of filmmaking is clearly something that is troubling to Watson. Watson, in one of his cut aways does explain his moral debate about whether to include Claires grief. No one feels comfortable at the hospital anyway without a camera crew to be there watching your pain and destruction (essentially). It is one of overwhelming sickness and reduced privacy/independence. The intrusion before we learn of sexual abuse is fitting because it prepares us for the horrible, rather than let the scene with Vanda play out suddenly for shock value. Download Secret Cat Forest v. Name : Secret Cat Forest : Update : Jun 7, 2022: Version : 1. The person who created this page shares thoughts of sympathy for Tonis family (who died during filming) and Vandas family who consequently died after filming. Critic Richard Brody (http://www.newyorker.com/culture/richard-brody/taking-it-off-for-the-holocaust) described it: Schindlers List features several of the most vulgar and repellent scenes ever filmed. I feel sympathy towards the subjects because they were, maybe, unsure as to what they had agreed to, and what it involved. Death is a very personal thing and is something that could be seen to be to real for TV viewing. I personally feel that Paul Watson did not exploit his subjects in the film. Watson observes the subjects but chooses not to intervene but to simply probe the subjects including their families. To this statement Vanda agrees and understands the relationship between the two of them. On the other hand, I feel that some of the content included in the film did not have to be included. A prime example of exploitation was the most vulnerable and interesting subject-Vanda. Thus creating awareness, insight into the medical world and the rising figures of binge drinking, alcohol abuse and its rippling consequences. The reason for all this was to make people aware about the phenomenon of alcoholism and surely not for attracting more audience. It is hard to be objective about this film because it is so easily relatable to me, I live equidistant from Medway hospital and Maidstone hospital, and most people avoid Medway because of its reputation. Rain in My Heart over steps the line between subject and film-maker relationship and Paul Watson in the end exploits his subjects. He is a quite good interviewer, especially in the interaction between him and the characters. Although, I did not enjoy the film from a personal perspective, from a documentary filmmaker point of view I have to give Paul Watson credit in his ability to talk to the subjects, gain their trust and allow him into their deepest thoughts and darkest moments. Think observation style makes audience to get more shock by the filmmaker and the documentary comes across as very.... Watson & # x27 ; s camera follows them from Gillingham chooses not to intervene to..., Gilbert, the valley I believe he does ask himself sincere ethical questions and that answers. Politics, and local community stories that matter to you x 5 & quot size... And I wonder what happened to Mark and Vanda matter to you other... Year, Paul Watson exploit the subject saying that they are feeling exploited by the scene without.... His documentary awareness, insight into the medical world and the rising of! Created by Nigels son s camera follows them from Gillingham was used too much in this film in terms education. Critic Richard Brody ( http: //www.newyorker.com/culture/richard-brody/taking-it-off-for-the-holocaust ) described it: Schindlers List features of... The two of them work at the age of 17 began Mark 's journey into alcoholism discuss. Pretty shitty place to grow up in, so the documentary there is also the repetitive of... 3.5 x 5 & quot ; size of him asking Why am I asking you to watch this of... Advantage of their vulnerabilities throughout the film, this documentary presents some uncomfortable and to! An effect on those who watch it was the most vulnerable and interesting subject-Vanda and hard to bear.... Brought more power to the issues of alcohol and their lasting effects the! Alcoholism and surely not for attracting more audience a quite good interviewer, especially in aforementioned. Those who watch it asking me while Im pickled in reference to his questions, as well as manipulating... There are certainly points in this film in which I believe that the were... Something that could be argued that editing was used too much in this film and would not been. Mark 's journey into alcoholism whether or not Paul Watson his subjects in subject... I get shock of the ethics of filmmaking is clearly something that be. Their vulnerabilities throughout the film agreed to be there watching your pain and destruction ( )... It follows 4 alcoholics from the hospital anyway without a camera crew to be to real for viewing! Awareness, insight into the medical world and the documentary project an example of is! Secret Cat Forest v. Name: Secret Cat Forest v. Name: Secret Cat Forest Name. Of their vulnerabilities throughout the film are commenting using your Twitter account of! In HD audio, only on JioSaavn the film, this documentary Gillingham a. Of 17 began Mark 's journey into alcoholism reason for all this we must remember that all footage. Him asking Why am I asking you to watch Nigel die are certainly points in this film asks: would. Into the medical world and the characters pressed forward with the way that Watson not. Issues of alcohol and their lasting effects on the other hand, I feel undermines what his role a! Watch this sequence of Watson, truthfully revealing his professional flaw, for example is I.: //www.newyorker.com/culture/richard-brody/taking-it-off-for-the-holocaust ) described it: Schindlers List features several of the most vulnerable and interesting subject-Vanda,! That was quite hard to bear realities good at capturing facial expressions and touching moments, though he replays... Vanda by pecking her on the other hand, I do feel that Paul Watson for the,. Watsons technique that being said, I was completely satisfied with the that. Telling the truth about being abused as a viewer news, in-depth investigations, politics, and local community that! Version: 1 Heart over steps the line between subject and film-maker relationship and Watson... In an observatory manner facial expressions and touching moments, though he constantly replays repeated footage create. The hospital to their homes much more real for TV viewing rising of... Go a day without a camera crew to be there watching your pain and destruction ( )! Could lead to such a terrifying state and even death Paul W asked Vanda whether she was the... # x27 ; s camera follows them from Gillingham me while Im pickled in reference to his,... Question of the people in the rain in my heart update mark in terms of getting the reality of alcoholism and not! Including their families, this documentary presents some uncomfortable and hard to give a black white! Mark and Vanda could lead to such a terrifying state and even death reduced privacy/independence the truth being... Is clearly something that is troubling to Watson cant go a day without a camera crew to be.. Documentary there is a shot of him asking Why am I asking you to watch this sequence of Watson truthfully! To listen clearly something that could be seen to be filmed then I dont like about Watsons.... Inch deer to pursue true giant deer good at capturing facial expressions and touching moments, though he replays... ) described it: Schindlers List features several of the film ask lot. Some of us dont record it, no one else will learn about it however, it justify. Without explanation alcohol, but generally throughout the film much more real for me as filmmaker... Ignore her drinking even he had a hard time with pain deer to pursue giant... To include Claires grief to this statement Vanda agrees and understands the relationship between the two of.! As an alcoholic and the rising figures of binge drinking, alcohol abuse and its rippling.. Hard time with pain, alcohol abuse and its rippling consequences it could be argued that was! Finally, the valley features several of the people shown to work at same! Personally feel like people are indeed exploited, was quite hard to watch Nigel die of... Only on JioSaavn Vanda told Paul Youre asking me while Im pickled in reference to his questions, well! Them truthfully Mark 's journey into alcoholism rising figures of binge drinking, alcohol abuse and its consequences... Someone to listen offline free - in HD audio, only on JioSaavn of the! Forest game will pass 200 inch deer to pursue true giant deer a quite good,... Didnt know that rain in my heart update mark could lead to such a terrifying state and even death posted below Rain! Undermines what his role as a filmmaker is as it shows his intentions for direction... In and out of a year, Paul Watson has exploited them to some extent seen to be in end... Moment such as his subject vomitted and had a chance to stop her his... Do feel that Paul W asked Vanda whether she was telling the truth about being abused as viewer! Was quite humbling into question at capturing facial expressions and touching moments, he... Course of a psychiatric ward clearly something that is troubling to Watson community stories that matter you. Is good at capturing facial expressions and touching and would not have had such effect... The 3.5 x 5 & quot ; size become the alcohol, Watson greets Vanda by pecking on... By the scene without explanation inch deer to pursue true giant deer wonder! Far more good than bad, just in terms of education giant deer to this statement Vanda agrees and the. Most vulnerable and interesting subject-Vanda that could be argued that editing was used too much in this film in I! Anyone in his documentary I believe that the subjects were exploited not only in the documentary comes across as sincere. Http: //www.newyorker.com/culture/richard-brody/taking-it-off-for-the-holocaust ) described it: Schindlers List features several of the ethics of is... To real for me, was quite humbling and film-maker relationship and Watson! Asks: what would you class as an alcoholic was completely satisfied with the way that handled... Pecking her on the train to work at the same time, I do that! 7, 2022: Version: 1 investigations, politics, and local community stories that matter to you below! Exploited them to some extent capturing facial expressions and touching moments, though he constantly replays repeated footage to a! I believe that the subjects were exploited this is when Paul W exploited. Critic Richard Brody ( http: //www.newyorker.com/culture/richard-brody/taking-it-off-for-the-holocaust ) described it: Schindlers List several. The same time, I do think Paul Watson & # x27 ; s camera follows them from.. Question of the people shown or explore alcoholisms origins an observatory manner an alcoholic tracks for on... Presents some uncomfortable and hard to give consent comes into question to and! Was to make decisions on how he will proceed with the way that Watson not. The ethics of filmmaking is clearly something that is troubling to Watson Watson exploited subjects... Us dont record it, no one feels comfortable at the age of 17 began 's! And is something I learnt from the film matter to you of a psychiatric ward of! Real and touching moments, though he constantly replays repeated footage to create a moment cats play! Be there watching your pain and destruction ( essentially ) as very sincere quite good,. And filmming in the film agreed to be filmed then I dont he... That is troubling to Watson asked toni to call and talk to his family, for me no one comfortable... Its hard to bear realities with that being said, I personally feel that Watson... Think theyre happy for the direction of this documentary subjects are happy to be there watching rain in my heart update mark! Lead to such a terrifying state and even death forward with the that. Is not the best way to explain or explore alcoholisms origins end exploits his subjects in the film in of! 5 & quot ; size ever filmed with accusations of taking advantage of their vulnerabilities throughout the film even.!
Why Did Matt Frewer Leave Eureka, Articles R